US, UK Trained ISIS Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi along with Mossad

image

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi made his first public appearance in Mosul a few days ago.

By Johnlee Varghese
July 15, 2014 19:12 IST
ibtimes.co.in

With the White House yet to give a full clarification on reports that the US trained ISIS recruits in 2012, another damning information has been leaked.

It has now emerged that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the terrorist group, was trained by Mossad, with the help of the US and the UK intelligence officials. The revelation was leaked by former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor and whistleblower Edward Snowden.

As per a report in Gulf Daily News, Snowden revealed that the US, the UK and Israel drew up a plan to protect the Zionist entity, by using a strategy called “the hornet’s nest”.

The strategy was to get all the terrorists together in one place under an Islamic slogan and engaging them in a war far from Israel.

In the documents leaked by Snowden, it claims that the ISIS was made for “the protection of the Jewish state”, and thereby keeping the enemies of Israel engaged.

Snowden’s leak also revealed that ISIS leader and cleric al-Baghdadi was given intensive military training for a whole year by Mossad, besides lessons on Islam and public speaking.

US Trained ISIS Jihadists?

Multiple reports have stated that the US played a key role in training the recruits, who later become ISIS jihadists, who are currently controlling large swathes of land in Syria and Iraq.

The WND had reported back in February 2012 that the US, along with Turkey and Jordan, was running a training base for Syrian rebels. And these trained rebels reportedly turned against the US later and went on to form the ISIS.

Thousands of rebels were trained in 2012 and 2013 in Jordon, German weekly Der Spiegel reported.

The report went on to note that the organizers of the training camps wore US Marine uniforms, and the recruits were trained in anti-tank weaponry.

Source: http://www.ibtimes.co.in/us-uk-trained-isis-leader-abu-bakr-al-baghdadi-along-mossad-604484#.U8U794bVE7o.facebook

Snowden confirms that Al Baghdadi was trained by Israeli Intel Mossad

GULF DAILY NEWS
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
WASHINGTON:

The former employee at US National Security Agency (NSA), Edward Snowden, has revealed that the British and American intelligence and the Mossad worked together to create the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

Snowden said intelligence services of three countries created a terrorist organisation that is able to attract all extremists of the world to one place, using a strategy called “the hornet’s nest”.

NSA documents refer to recent implementation of the hornet’s nest to protect the Zionist entity by creating religious and Islamic slogans.

According to documents released by Snowden, “The only solution for the protection of the Jewish state “is to create an enemy near its borders”.

Leaks revealed that ISIS leader and cleric Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi took intensive military training for a whole year in the hands of Mossad, besides courses in theology and the art of speech.

Source: http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/NewsDetails.aspx?storyid=381153

The New World Order: America, Britain, “Israel” and the Real Global Struggle By Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin

image

The real nature of today’s conflicts comes down to a philosophical struggle between the political ideologues of monarchy and democracy.

In today’s world, the game begins with getting right the definition of “Israel”. The global leader for monarchy in the West was Britain, while for democracy, America.

Historically, by definition, “Israel” had to be a monarchy (1 Chron. 17:12; II Sam. 7:13), this is why in the American Revolution, religion played arguably the most important and major role by offering a moral sanction for opposition to the British–an assurance to the average American that revolution was justified in the sight of God.

The Revolution split “New England”, or America, from the Church of England, whose ministers were bound by oath to support the King.

After breaking from the Church of England, America sought to justify its split from the throne of David and the Old Testament’s definition of “Israel” through the eventual establishment of a democratic Jewish State in 1948. Hence the Jewish State of Israel’s existence is deemed the top global national security priority for America, as repeatedly stated by its elected Presidents, including President Obama.

The real philosophical or ideological rivals in today’s world are actually the Americans and the British, who disagree philosophically on the definition of “Israel”.

The British and Europeans have always held “Israel” to exist only if governed by a monarch from the House of David, and emphasized bloodline over everything else.

The Americans decided, although educated by the British, under the influence of the French, bloodline did not matter, rather only race did.

As long as one was an Israelite, the early settlers considered themselves descendants of the ten tribes, any able bodied man with a sound intellect, can lead as President.

The British argued according to the Old Testament, stating only a direct descendant of King David, who sits on the throne, enables a nation to be honored with the name “Israel”.  (The name “Israel” is considered an honor, according to the Quran as well, conferred upon Jacob, the son of Isaac)

Hence, since the earliest moments in American history, a new idea was conceived and emerged.  A plan based on the philosophy of the American rebellion was launched, to emphasize nation race, over bloodline.

The Rise of America

The Americans rebelled against the British monarchy, and these plans were launched simultaneously.

Then, nationalism was spread, racism spread internationally, and nation states began to rise.

Empires crumbled, including the British, the Ottomans, the Russian, and the Mughal. Monarchies throughout Europe and the world were conspired against, and began to crumble, not realizing what was happening and why. 

The Muslim Caliphate, a monarchy with dynastic political and spiritual succession since the era of the forth Rashidun Caliph, to the Umayyads, the Abassids, the Fatimids, Cordoba, Morocco, and the Ottomans, was conspired against, and “abolished” in 1924.

All of this was carried out to eventually bring religious legitimacy to the American Revoltution against the British throne of David, and the Church of England.

A New World Order

A new world order was secretly being established, wherein “New England”, or America, was justified in the sight of God to acquire its “manifest destiny” to rule as the new “Israel”, without a king.

Wars were planned, and fought for this goal, and nation states were established.  Monarchy declined in Europe, and after the last significant monarch, the world’s wealthiest man, who married his son into the Imperial House of Osman, to the daughter of the last Ottoman Caliph after the royal family had been exiled from Turkey; H.E.H. The Nizam of Hyderabad was toppled in 1948, and the democratic Jewish State of Israel was established in Palestine, with full American support.

The Jewish State of Israel became for the Americans, what the Vatican was for Rome.

A Divided West

So severe was this internal struggle between these two philosophies, that in 1812, Canadians loyal to the British crown, burned down the White House, sacked Washington, and burned down the President’s House.

This schism continued into recent times, although most people are unaware.

In the 60 years Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has been on the throne, she has undertaken 261 official overseas visits, including 78 State visits, to 116 different countries including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Morocco, Turkey, Sudan, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.  To date, neither Her Majesty, nor any members of the British royal family have made an official visit to the Jewish State of Israel.

Impact on the Muslim World

This new world order directly impacted the Muslim world.  Under their monarchies, and the Caliphate, Muslims throughout the world were accustomed to cultural, intellectual and military superiority, sophistication and power.

In this new world order, those who were once most influential, and sophisticated, became least relevant, weak, and humiliated. 

When monarchies were toppled in the Muslim world, and subsequently the Caliphate, those who brought science, philosophy, spirituality, inventions, and illumination to the West, fell from grace, into the lowest ebbs of darkness.

The Real Global Conflict

Everything we see today of conflict, began with America’s need to validate and legitimize its right under God, to its “manifest destiny”, as a democracy, and as the new “Israel”.

In order to create and maintain this new world order, America and its Western NATO and other allies, the leaders of democracy, supported and armed arguably the worst tyrant in history, the Jewish State of Israel.  They tolerated in the name of religion, “Zionism”, the Jewish State’s indiscriminate genocide of the Arab population in their homeland.  They nursed them from their birth in 1948 with spohisticated weapons and a significant nuclear arsenal, to facilitate the commiting of some of the most henious and unprecendented acts of State sponsored terrorism in history, creating arguably the greatest political irony in Western history: a democratic “Jewish State of Israel”.

Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin’s Condolence Letter to Madad ul-Haqq Mawlana Shaykh Hisham Kabbani and Shaykh Hisham’s Reply -June 15th, 2014

image

Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim.  As Salamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu

11:73 “The grace of Allah and His blessings be upon you, O People of the House! He is indeed worthy of all praise full of all glory!”

33:33 “Allah intends only to remove from you the impurity, O people of the Household, and to purify you with purification”

To His Eminence Madad ul-Haqq, the Qutb ul-Mutasarrif, Khalifa of Saheb uz-Zaman, al-Sayyid al-Sharif, Dr. Mawlana Shaykh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, may Haqq continue to be under your Support, and its people continue to find shelter in you!

I wish to offer my heartfelt condolences to you and your illuminated family on the veiling of your venerable father-in law, our Holy GrandShaykh.

I was unable to discuss, acknowledge and come to terms with this tremendous loss earlier so I waited until the passing of forty days.  Please accept my belated condolences.

It will please you to know we are going to receiving a high level delegation from Palestine and Jerusalem, headed by His Holiness the Grand Mufti Muhammad AM Hussein between June 19th-23, 2014.  I will speak about your miracles and Sultan ul-Awliya before him.  He will, among other programs, inaugurate a conference on Sufism while here with us.  

We in Hyderabad are still anxiously awaiting a visit by you and hope it will be soon.

With love,

Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin
June 15th, 2014

Mawlana Shaykh Hisham al-Kabbani’s Reply to Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin-June 15th, 2014

Salams. Mawlana Shaykh Hisham sends his love and Salams to you.  He thanks you for the news and prays per its success. He wanted to tell you that you are one of 40 khalifah of Mehdi(as) and your name Amongst them I will give you later…InshaAllah I will be visiting Hydrebad soon. I will let you know when.”

.

Open Letter to GF Haddad in Reply to his Malicious Post Regarding the Lines of Succession to Mawlana Shaykh Nazim by Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin-July 8th, 2014

image

'Abd al-Muttalib at the Ka'aba-Ottoman manuscript

3:61 If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: “Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!”

“O You who worshipped a Cross all of your youth while I worshipped in the Haram, whose parents did not call the Adhaan and Iqamah into your ears upon your ill fated birth, while mine did, whose parents did not practise circumcision of him as per the Covenant of my forefathers Abraham and Ishmael, while I was born into the House of Abraham and Ishmael, you who believed Jesus to be superior to my grandfather Muhammad ibn ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Abd al-Muttallib all your youth, while I recited the Salutation of the Crown (Darud i-Taj), you who committed shirk and kufr throughout your youth, while I memorized the Quran and prostrated towards Mecca, you who ate the flesh of swine, and non-zabiha meat your entire youth, while we sacrificed for Eid ul-Adha from the age of maturity; you call me “counterfeit” because you in fact disapprove of my opposition to the Jewish State of Israel, and democracy over monarchy.

You call me “counterfeit” because I say you are on manifest error when you claim Yazid ibn Muawiyya is one of the twelve imams, because I reject your position that Yazid was one of the righteous twelve caliphs mentioned in the hadith of twelve caliphs from Quraysh and that I reject your words “Allah was pleased with him” for Yazid, because I reject your denial of the creation of the Twelve Veils with the Nur i-Muhammadiyya when they are mentioned by Mawlana’s wife in her book on the auspicious Sirah and endorsed by him and Mawlana Shaykh Hisham, because I demonstrated cursing Yazid ibn Muawiyya is sound, and the way of the greats of the Naqshbandiyya and in not the way of those who are extremists as you erroneously claim, because I demonstrated that the elders of Naqshbandiyya believe Saheb uz-Zaman Imam Muhammad ibn Hasan al-’Askari is the Mahdi, as did Sultan ul-Awliya Mawlana Shaykh Nazim on record, Shaykh Adnan in person to me, and Shaykh Hisham in writing and on video, you should know I am not afraid of you, your American passport and pledge to the flag of the United States of America.

Your belief in democracy over monarchy, nor your misguided attempts at propaganda cannot harm me.

It is not I who pretends to be something I am not, rather it is you who mislead Muslims into believing you are a born Sharif, Haddad, when in fact you were born into polytheism, a Christan by birth!

My grandfather, the Prophet, Sallallahu alayhi wa aalih, said: “O Children of ‘Abd al-Muttalib! I have beseeched Allah to convert the ignorant among you into learned men, and to make you steadfast in your stand, and to guide those of you who are gone astray; and to make you brave, generous and kind. By Allah, if a person were to offer prayers between al-Rukn and al-Maqam, but at the same time die with hatred towards you, such a person will enter hellfire.”

My grandfathers the Messenger of Allah (Sallallahu alayhi wa aalih), Shah e-Mardan ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, Hasan ibn ‘Ali, Husayn ibn ‘Ali, ‘Ali ibn Husayn, Muhammad ibn ‘Ali, Ja’far ibn Muhammad, Musa ibn Ja’far, ‘Ali ibn Ja’far, Muhammad ibn ‘Ali, ‘Ali ibn Muhammad, Hasan ibn ‘Ali, and Ghawth al-Adham Shaykh ‘Abd al-Qadir al-Jilani, and my Shaykhs Khwaja Baha al-Din Shah Naqshband and Mawlana Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani observes you, and will respond to you instead of me.

Related Posts:

Dr. Gibril F Haddad on eShaykh.com: “According to the Holy Prophet (S), Yazid is one of the 12 Imams…may Allah have mercy on him”

Re: “And Yazid is Not Cursed After His Death” by Dr. G.F Haddad

Belief in the Twelve Veils By Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin

Re: Naqshbandi luminaries believed Hadrat Mahdi was the son of Imam Hasan al-Askari?

Mawlana Shaykh Nazim’s Statement Regarding Sahib uz-Zaman Imam al-Mahdi ‘alayhi salam

Masjid an-Nabawi (S): Names of the Twelve Imams

“As the Arabs see the Jews” His Majesty King Abdullah, The American Magazine November, 1947  

image

His Majesty King Abdullah I, King of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (1946–51)

I am especially delighted to address an American audience, for the tragic problem of Palestine will never be solved without American understanding, American sympathy, American support.

So many billions of words have been written about Palestine—perhaps more than on any other subject in history—that I hesitate to add to them. Yet I am compelled to do so, for I am reluctantly convinced that the world in general, and America in particular, knows almost nothing of the true case for the Arabs.

We Arabs follow, perhaps far more than you think, the press of America. We are frankly disturbed to find that for every word printed on the Arab side, a thousand are printed on the Zionist side.

There are many reasons for this. You have many millions of Jewish citizens interested in this question. They are highly vocal and wise in the ways of publicity. There are few Arab citizens in America, and we are as yet unskilled in the technique of modern propaganda.

The results have been alarming for us. In your press we see a horrible caricature and are told it is our true portrait. In all justice, we cannot let this pass by default.

Our case is quite simple: For nearly 2,000 years Palestine has been almost 100 per cent Arab. It is still preponderantly Arab today, in spite of enormous Jewish immigration. But if this immigration continues we shall soon be outnumbered—a minority in our home.

Palestine is a small and very poor country, about the size of your state of Vermont. Its Arab population is only about 1,200,000. Already we have had forced on us, against our will, some 600,000 Zionist Jews. We are threatened with many hundreds of thousands more.

Our position is so simple and natural that we are amazed it should even be questioned. It is exactly the same position you in America take in regard to the unhappy European Jews. You are sorry for them, but you do not want them in your country.

We do not want them in ours, either. Not because they are Jews, but because they are foreigners. We would not want hundreds of thousands of foreigners in our country, be they Englishmen or Norwegians or Brazilians or whatever.

Think for a moment: In the last 25 years we have had one third of our entire population forced upon us. In America that would be the equivalent of 45,000,000 complete strangers admitted to your country, over your violent protest, since 1921. How would you have reacted to that?

Because of our perfectly natural dislike of being overwhelmed in our own homeland, we are called blind nationalists and heartless anti-Semites. This charge would be ludicrous were it not so dangerous.

No people on earth have been less “anti-Semitic” than the Arabs. The persecution of the Jews has been confined almost entirely to the Christian nations of the West. Jews, themselves, will admit that never since the Great Dispersion did Jews develop so freely and reach such importance as in Spain when it was an Arab possession. With very minor exceptions, Jews have lived for many centuries in the Middle East, in complete peace and friendliness with their Arab neighbours.

Damascus, Baghdad, Beirut and other Arab centres have always contained large and prosperous Jewish colonies. Until the Zionist invasion of Palestine began, these Jews received the most generous treatment—far, far better than in Christian Europe. Now, unhappily, for the first time in history, these Jews are beginning to feel the effects of Arab resistance to the Zionist assault. Most of them are as anxious as Arabs to stop it. Most of these Jews who have found happy homes among us resent, as we do, the coming of these strangers.

I was puzzled for a long time about the odd belief which apparently persists in America that Palestine has somehow “always been a Jewish land.” Recently an American I talked to cleared up this mystery. He pointed out that the only things most Americans know about Palestine are what they read in the Bible. It was a Jewish land in those days, they reason, and they assume it has always remained so.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. It is absurd to reach so far back into the mists of history to argue about who should have Palestine today, and I apologise for it. Yet the Jews do this, and I must reply to their “historic claim.” I wonder if the world has ever seen a stranger sight than a group of people seriously pretending to claim a land because their ancestors lived there some 2,000 years ago!

If you suggest that I am biased, I invite you to read any sound history of the period and verify the facts.

Such fragmentary records as we have indicate that the Jews were wandering nomads from Iraq who moved to southern Turkey, came south to Palestine, stayed there a short time, and then passed to Egypt, where they remained about 400 years. About 1300 BC (according to your calendar) they left Egypt and gradually conquered most—but not all—of the inhabitants of Palestine.

It is significant that the Philistines—not the Jews—gave their name to the country: “Palestine” is merely the Greek form of “Philistia.”

Only once, during the empire of David and Solomon, did the Jews ever control nearly—but not all—the land which is today Palestine. This empire lasted only 70 years, ending in 926 BC. Only 250 years later the Kingdom of Judah had shrunk to a small province around Jerusalem, barely a quarter of modern Palestine.

In 63 BC the Jews were conquered by Roman Pompey, and never again had even the vestige of independence. The Roman Emperor Hadrian finally wiped them out about 135 AD. He utterly destroyed Jerusalem, rebuilt under another name, and for hundreds of years no Jew was permitted to enter it. A handful of Jews remained in Palestine but the vast majority were killed or scattered to other countries, in the Diaspora, or the Great Dispersion. From that time Palestine ceased to be a Jewish country, in any conceivable sense.

This was 1,815 years ago, and yet the Jews solemnly pretend they still own Palestine! If such fantasy were allowed, how the map of the world would dance about!

Italians might claim England, which the Romans held so long. England might claim France, “homeland” of the conquering Normans. And the French Normans might claim Norway, where their ancestors originated. And incidentally, we Arabs might claim Spain, which we held for 700 years.

Many Mexicans might claim Spain, “homeland” of their forefathers. They might even claim Texas, which was Mexican until 100 years ago. And suppose the American Indians claimed the “homeland” of which they were the sole, native, and ancient occupants until only some 450 years ago!

I am not being facetious. All these claims are just as valid—or just as fantastic—as the Jewish “historic connection” with Palestine. Most are more valid.

In any event, the great Moslem expansion about 650 AD finally settled things. It dominated Palestine completely. From that day on, Palestine was solidly Arabic in population, language, and religion. When British armies entered the country during the last war, they found 500,000 Arabs and only 65,000 Jews.

If solid, uninterrupted Arab occupation for nearly 1,300 years does not make a country “Arab”, what does?

The Jews say, and rightly, that Palestine is the home of their religion. It is likewise the birthplace of Christianity, but would any Christian nation claim it on that account? In passing, let me say that the Christian Arabs—and there are many hundreds of thousands of them in the Arab World—are in absolute agreement with all other Arabs in opposing the Zionist invasion of Palestine.

May I also point out that Jerusalem is, after Mecca and Medina, the holiest place in Islam. In fact, in the early days of our religion, Moslems prayed toward Jerusalem instead of Mecca.

The Jewish “religious claim” to Palestine is as absurd as the “historic claim.” The Holy Places, sacred to three great religions, must be open to all, the monopoly of none. Let us not confuse religion and politics.

We are told that we are inhumane and heartless because do not accept with open arms the perhaps 200,000 Jews in Europe who suffered so frightfully under Nazi cruelty, and who even now—almost three years after war’s end—still languish in cold, depressing camps.

Let me underline several facts. The unimaginable persecution of the Jews was not done by the Arabs: it was done by a Christian nation in the West. The war which ruined Europe and made it almost impossible for these Jews to rehabilitate themselves was fought by the Christian nations of the West. The rich and empty portions of the earth belong, not to the Arabs, but to the Christian nations of the West.

And yet, to ease their consciences, these Christian nations of the West are asking Palestine—a poor and tiny Moslem country of the East—to accept the entire burden. “We have hurt these people terribly,” cries the West to the East. “Won’t you please take care of them for us?”

We find neither logic nor justice in this. Are we therefore “cruel and heartless nationalists”?

We are a generous people: we are proud that “Arab hospitality” is a phrase famous throughout the world. We are a humane people: no one was shocked more than we by the Hitlerite terror. No one pities the present plight of the desperate European Jews more than we.

But we say that Palestine has already sheltered 600,000 refugees. We believe that is enough to expect of us—even too much. We believe it is now the turn of the rest of the world to accept some of them.

I will be entirely frank with you. There is one thing the Arab world simply cannot understand. Of all the nations of the earth, America is most insistent that something be done for these suffering Jews of Europe. This feeling does credit to the humanity for which America is famous, and to that glorious inscription on your Statue of Liberty.

And yet this same America—the richest, greatest, most powerful nation the world has ever known—refuses to accept more than a token handful of these same Jews herself!

I hope you will not think I am being bitter about this. I have tried hard to understand that mysterious paradox, and I confess I cannot. Nor can any other Arab.

Perhaps you have been informed that “the Jews in Europe want to go to no other place except Palestine.”

This myth is one of the greatest propaganda triumphs of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, the organisation which promotes with fanatic zeal the emigration to Palestine. It is a subtle half-truth, thus doubly dangerous.

The astounding truth is that nobody on earth really knows where these unfortunate Jews really want to go!

You would think that in so grave a problem, the American, British, and other authorities responsible for the European Jews would have made a very careful survey, probably by vote, to find out where each Jew actually wants to go. Amazingly enough this has never been done! The Jewish Agency has prevented it.

Some time ago the American Military Governor in Germany was asked at a press conference how he was so certain that all Jews there wanted to go to Palestine. His answer was simple: “My Jewish advisors tell me so.” He admitted no poll had ever been made. Preparations were indeed begun for one, but the Jewish Agency stepped in to stop it.

The truth is that the Jews in German camps are now subjected to a Zionist pressure campaign which learned much from the Nazi terror. It is dangerous for a Jew to say that he would rather go to some other country, not Palestine. Such dissenters have been severely beaten, and worse.

Not long ago, in Palestine, nearly 1,000 Austrian Jews informed the international refugee organisation that they would like to go back to Austria, and plans were made to repatriate them.

The Jewish Agency heard of this, and exerted enough political pressure to stop it. It would be bad propaganda for Zionism if Jews began leaving Palestine. The nearly 1,000 Austrian are still there, against their will.

The fact is that most of the European Jews are Western in culture and outlook, entirely urban in experience and habits. They cannot really have their hearts set on becoming pioneers in the barren, arid, cramped land which is Palestine.

One thing, however, is undoubtedly true. As matters stand now, most refugee Jews in Europe would, indeed, vote for Palestine, simply because they know no other country will have them.

If you or I were given a choice between a near-prison camp for the rest of our lives—or Palestine—we would both choose Palestine, too.

But open up any other alternative to them—give them any other choice, and see what happens!

No poll, however, will be worth anything unless the nations of the earth are willing to open their doors—just a little—to the Jews. In other words, if in such a poll a Jew says he wants to go to Sweden, Sweden must be willing to accept him. If he votes for America, you must let him come in.

Any other kind of poll would be a farce. For the desperate Jew, this is no idle testing of opinion: this is a grave matter of life or death. Unless he is absolutely sure that his vote means something, he will always vote for Palestine, so as not to risk his bird in the hand for one in the bush.

In any event, Palestine can accept no more. The 65,000 Jews in Palestine in 1918 have jumped to 600,000 today. We Arabs have increased, too, but not by immigration. The Jews were then a mere 11 per cent of our population. Today they are one third of it.

The rate of increase has been terrifying. In a few more years—unless stopped now—it will overwhelm us, and we shall be an important minority in our own home.

Surely the rest of the wide world is rich enough and generous enough to find a place for 200,000 Jews—about one third the number that tiny, poor Palestine has already sheltered. For the rest of the world, it is hardly a drop in the bucket. For us it means national suicide.

We are sometimes told that since the Jews came to Palestine, the Arab standard of living has improved. This is a most complicated question. But let us even assume, for the argument, that it is true. We would rather be a bit poorer, and masters of our own home. Is this unnatural?

The sorry story of the so-called “Balfour Declaration,” which started Zionist immigration into Palestine, is too complicated to repeat here in detail. It is grounded in broken promises to the Arabs—promises made in cold print which admit no denying.

We utterly deny its validity. We utterly deny the right of Great Britain to give away Arab land for a “national home” for an entirely foreign people.

Even the League of Nations sanction does not alter this. At the time, not a single Arab state was a member of the League. We were not allowed to say a word in our own defense.

I must point out, again in friendly frankness, that America was nearly as responsible as Britain for this Balfour Declaration. President Wilson approved it before it was issued, and the American Congress adopted it word for word in a joint resolution on 30th June, 1922.

In the 1920s, Arabs were annoyed and insulted by Zionist immigration, but not alarmed by it. It was steady, but fairly small, as even the Zionist founders thought it would remain. Indeed for some years, more Jews left Palestine than entered it—in 1927 almost twice as many.

But two new factors, entirely unforeseen by Britain or the League or America or the most fervent Zionist, arose in the early thirties to raise the immigration to undreamed heights. One was the World Depression; the second the rise of Hitler.

In 1932, the year before Hitler came to power, only 9,500 Jews came to Palestine. We did not welcome them, but we were not afraid that, at that rate, our solid Arab majority would ever be in danger.

But the next year—the year of Hitler—it jumped to 30,000! In 1934 it was 42,000! In 1935 it reached 61,000!

It was no longer the orderly arrival of idealist Zionists. Rather, all Europe was pouring its frightened Jews upon us. Then, at last, we, too, became frightened. We knew that unless this enormous influx stopped, we were, as Arabs, doomed in our Palestine homeland. And we have not changed our minds.

I have the impression that many Americans believe the trouble in Palestine is very remote from them, that America had little to do with it, and that your only interest now is that of a humane bystander.

I believe that you do not realise how directly you are, as a nation, responsible in general for the whole Zionist move and specifically for the present terrorism. I call this to your attention because I am certain that if you realise your responsibility you will act fairly to admit it and assume it.

Quite aside from official American support for the “National Home” of the Balfour Declaration, the Zionist settlements in Palestine would have been almost impossible, on anything like the current scale, without American money. This was contributed by American Jewry in an idealistic effort to help their fellows.

The motive was worthy: the result were disastrous. The contributions were by private individuals, but they were almost entirely Americans, and, as a nation, only America can answer for it.

The present catastrophe may be laid almost entirely at your door. Your government, almost alone in the world, is insisting on the immediate admission of 100,000 more Jews into Palestine—to be followed by countless additional ones. This will have the most frightful consequences in bloody chaos beyond anything ever hinted at in Palestine before.

It is your press and political leadership, almost alone in the world, who press this demand. It is almost entirely American money which hires or buys the “refugee ships” that steam illegally toward Palestine: American money which pays their crews. The illegal immigration from Europe is arranged by the Jewish Agency, supported almost entirely by American funds. It is American dollars which support the terrorists, which buy the bullets and pistols that kill British soldiers—your allies—and Arab citizens—your friends.

We in the Arab world were stunned to hear that you permit open advertisements in newspapers asking for money to finance these terrorists, to arm them openly and deliberately for murder. We could not believe this could really happen in the modern world. Now we must believe it: we have seen the advertisements with our own eyes.

I point out these things because nothing less than complete frankness will be of use. The crisis is too stark for mere polite vagueness which means nothing.

I have the most complete confidence in the fair-mindedness and generosity of the American public. We Arabs ask no favours. We ask only that you know the full truth, not half of it. We ask only that when you judge the Palestine question, you put yourselves in our place.

What would your answer be if some outside agency told you that you must accept in America many millions of utter strangers in your midst—enough to dominate your country—merely because they insisted on going to America, and because their forefathers had once lived there some 2,000 years ago?

Our answer is the same.

And what would be your action if, in spite of your refusal, this outside agency began forcing them on you?

Ours will be the same.

http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/kabd_eng.html

“There is No Victory Except with Ahl al-Bayt” -Sultan ul-Awliya al-Sayyid al-Sharif Mawlana Shaykh Nazim Adil al-Haqqani (qad)

image

“(O Arabs!) Honour them (Ahl al Bayt) and Allah will honour you…There is no victory except with them. With them you will be victorious. With them you will be provided for, with them you will be honoured…You must honour him (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) because the beginning is with him (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) and the end of religion is with them (Ahl al Bayt). It ends with them also. The first banner, the banner of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam), was raised and then they changed, and changed it, and now the banner of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) must be raised so Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) may put in the hearts of the unbelievers the fear of Islam, the glory of Islam…”-Shaykh al-Akbar al-Sayyid al-Sharif Mawlana Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani qadasAllahu sirrahul ‘aziz, Oct 14th, 2012

ISIS Imposter Caliphate & Sahih Narration of Ibn Umar

image

Transcript from Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin morning Sohbet July 1st, 2014:

…There are eighteen Abdaal in Iraq. Twenty-eight in Sham. Of these twenty-eight, two are in Jordan, and one in Lebanon.  

They said, what is happening in Iraq, with the declaration of the Impostor Caliph has resulted in the following. The Jewish State of Israel’s endorsement for an “independent” State for the Kurdish population in Iraq has officially come to the front as of yesterday.  This makes clear who is doing what and why. Next, the declaration of the Impostor Caliph on grounds of his falsified descent from the House of the Prophet, from the Children of al-Husayn, brings to the forefront of the Arab Middle East, irrespective of sect, the doctrine of Right Divine to lead the Arabs of the Quraysh, the Hashemites, the Aliids, the Fatimids, and the House of al-Hasan and al-Husayn.  Wahhabism, and Salafism collapsed.   Lastly, the declaration of the formation of an Impostor Caliphate brings back to life the repressed political philosophy of the Dawlat al-Khilafah, a borderless Arab kingdom, Saltanat, united under a single king, titled Caliph, from the House of the Prophet, with a unified currency, as originally proposed and established by Sharif Hussein after the first Arab Spring.

The Arabs are awakened since yesterday. It is like the Lion getting its first taste of blood. No one can stop anything from now onwards. Palestine will be resolved. Hezbollah will turn on Iran. ISIS will be crushed, and purged from Iraq, as it was in Syria. The Jewish State of Israel will be hit “from above” in a “strange and gruesome” way, “smashing its centre”.  America weakens.  Two borders collapse.  Turkey gets involved, rises.  The Hashemites receive protection from the Turks…

…What they said this morning Amjad Qureshi, is in line with this hadith. Dajjal already left America. He heads for the Jewish State of Israel. Charles ascends to the Throne of the House of David, and the real kingdom of the Children of Israel is established in the West. Upon His Majesty’s ascension, America, the Impostor Head of the West today, bows to England. Seeing this, the loss of its greatest ally, the Impostor Jewish State of Israel, with its army, produces Dajjal. He creates havoc for forty-days. Then Isa ibn Mariam descends. The Mahdi Rises…

Narration of Abdullah ibn Umar:

When we were sitting with the Messenger of Allah (S) he talked about periods of trial (fitnahs), mentioning many of them.

When he mentioned the one when people should stay in their houses, some asked him: Messenger of Allah, what is the trial (fitnah) of staying at home?

He replied: It will be flight and plunder. Then will come a test which is pleasant. Its murkiness is due to the fact that it is produced by a man from the people of my house, who will assert that he belongs to me, whereas he does not, for my friends are only the God-fearing. Then the people will unite under a man who will be like a hip-bone on a rib. Then there will be the little black trial which will leave none of this community without giving him a slap, and when people say that it is finished, it will be extended. During it a man will be a believer in the morning and an infidel in the evening, so that the people will be in two camps: the camp of faith which will contain no hypocrisy, and the camp of hypocrisy which will contain no faith. When that happens, expect the Antichrist (Dajjal) that day or the next.

حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ الْحِمْصِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْمُغِيرَةِ، حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ سَالِمٍ، حَدَّثَنِي الْعَلاَءُ بْنُ عُتْبَةَ، عَنْ عُمَيْرِ بْنِ هَانِئٍ الْعَنْسِيِّ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ عُمَرَ، يَقُولُ كُنَّا قُعُودًا عِنْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَذَكَرَ الْفِتَنَ فَأَكْثَرَ فِي ذِكْرِهَا حَتَّى ذَكَرَ فِتْنَةَ الأَحْلاَسِ فَقَالَ قَائِلٌ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا فِتْنَةُ الأَحْلاَسِ قَالَ  ” هِيَ هَرَبٌ وَحَرْبٌ ثُمَّ فِتْنَةُ السَّرَّاءِ دَخَنُهَا مِنْ تَحْتِ قَدَمَىْ رَجُلٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ بَيْتِي يَزْعُمُ أَنَّهُ مِنِّي وَلَيْسَ مِنِّي وَإِنَّمَا أَوْلِيَائِيَ الْمُتَّقُونَ ثُمَّ يَصْطَلِحُ النَّاسُ عَلَى رَجُلٍ كَوَرِكٍ عَلَى ضِلَعٍ ثُمَّ فِتْنَةُ الدُّهَيْمَاءِ لاَ تَدَعُ أَحَدًا مِنْ هَذِهِ الأُمَّةِ إِلاَّ لَطَمَتْهُ لَطْمَةً فَإِذَا قِيلَ انْقَضَتْ تَمَادَتْ يُصْبِحُ الرَّجُلُ فِيهَا مُؤْمِنًا وَيُمْسِي كَافِرًا حَتَّى يَصِيرَ النَّاسُ إِلَى فُسْطَاطَيْنِ فُسْطَاطِ إِيمَانٍ لاَ نِفَاقَ فِيهِ وَفُسْطَاطِ نِفَاقٍ لاَ إِيمَانَ فِيهِ فَإِذَا كَانَ ذَاكُمْ فَانْتَظِرُوا الدَّجَّالَ مِنْ يَوْمِهِ أَوْ مِنْ غَدِهِ ” .
Grade : Sahih (Al-Albani)   صحيح   (الألباني) حكم : Reference: Sunan Abi Dawud 4242 In-book reference : Book 37, Hadith 3 English translation : Book 36, Hadith 4230.

King and Country The Hashemite Solution for Iraq By Bernard Lewis and R. James Woolsey

image

The first Caliph from the House of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib since al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali (d.670), and first Arab-Hashemite Caliph since the fall of the Abbasid Caliphate in 1258; His Exalted Highness Sayyid Hussein bin Ali, GCB, the Sharif of Mecca, Emir of Mecca (1908-1917), King of the Hejaz, and King of the Arabs, Caliph of the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu 'alayhi wa aalih).

October 29th, 2003

Following the recent passage of the Security Council resolution on Iraq, the key issue continues to be how quickly to move toward sovereignty and democracy for a new government. The resolution’s call for the Iraqi Governing Council to establish a timetable by Dec. 15 for creating a constitution and
a democratic government has papered over differences for the time being.

But there are still substantial disagreements even among people who want to see democracy and the rule of law in Iraq as promptly as possible. The U.S. sees the need for time to do the job right.

France, Germany and Russia want both more U.N. participation and more speed–a pair of mutually exclusive objectives if there ever was one. Some Iraqis call for an elected constitutional convention, others for a rapid conferring of sovereignty, some for both. Many Middle Eastern governments oppose democracy and thus some support whatever they think will fail.

There may be a path through this thickening fog, made thicker by the rocket and suicide-bombing attacks of the last three days. It is important to help Ambassador Paul Bremer and the coalition forces to establish security. But it is also important to take an early step toward Iraqi sovereignty and to move toward representative government. The key is that Iraq already has a constitution. It was legally adopted in 1925 and Iraq was governed under it until the series of military, then Baathist, coups began in 1958 and brought over four decades of steadily worsening dictatorship. Iraqis never chose to abandon their 1925 constitution–it was taken from them. The document is not ideal, and it is doubtless not the constitution under which a modern democratic Iraq will ultimately be governed. But a quick review indicates that it has some very useful features that would permit it to be used on an interim basis while a new constitution is drafted. Indeed, the latter could be approved as an omnibus amendment to the 1925 document. This seems possible because the 1925 Iraqi constitution–which establishes that the nation’s sovereignty “resides in the people”–provides for an elected lower house of parliament, which has a major role in approving constitutional amendments. It also contains a section on “The Rights of the People” that declares Islam as the official religion, but also provides for freedom of worship for all Islamic sects and indeed for all religions and for “complete freedom of conscience.” It further guarantees “freedom of expression of opinion, liberty of publication, of meeting together, and of forming and joining associations.” In different words, the essence of much of our own Bill of Rights is reflected therein.

We need not shy away from the 1925 constitution because it establishes a constitutional monarchy.

Understandings could readily be worked out that would not lead to a diminution of Amb. Bremer’s substantive authority in vital areas during the transition- some ministries may, e.g., transition to Iraqi control before others. In the document as it now stands the monarch has some important powers since he appoints the government’s ministers, including a prime minister, l and the members of the upper house, or senate. Many of these and other provisions would doubtless be changed through amendment, although the members of the current Governing Council might be reasonably appointed to some of these positions on an interim basis. Some new features, such as explicit recognition of equal rights for women, a point not clear in the 1925 document, would need to be adopted at the outset. During a transition, pursuant to consultations with Amb. Bremer and with groups in Iraq, the king could under the constitution appoint ministers, including a prime minister, and also adopt provisional rules for elections. The elected parliament could then take a leading role in amending the constitution and establishing the rules for holding further elections.

Using the 1925 constitution as a transitional document would be entirely consistent with permanently establishing as head of state either a president or a monarch that, like the U.K.’s, reigns but does not rule.

It is worth noting that monarchy and l democracy coexist happily in a number of countries. Indeed, of the nations that have been democracies for a very long time and show every sign that they will remain so, a substantial majority are constitutional monarchies (the U.S. and Switzerland being the principal exceptions). And we should recall how important King Juan Carlos was to the transition from fascism to democracy in Spain. As odd as the notion may seem to Americans whose national identity was forged in rebellion against George III, there is nothing fundamentally undemocratic about a limited monarchy’s serving as a transitional, or even a long-term, constitutional structure in Iraq or any other country.

Selecting the right monarch for the transitional government would be vitally important.

Conveniently, the 1925 constitution provides that the people of Iraq are deemed to have “confided … a trust” to “King Faisal, son of Hussain, and to his heirs….” If the allies who liberated Iraq recognized an heir of this Hashemite line as its constitutional monarch, and this monarch agreed to help bring about a modern democracy under the rule of law, such a structure could well be the framework for a much smoother transition to democracy than now seems at hand.

The Sunni Hashemites, being able to claim direct descent from the Prophet Mohammed, have historically been respected by the Shiites, who constitute a majority of the people of Iraq, although the latter recognize a different branch of the family. It is the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia, not the Hashemites, who have been the Shiites’ persecutors.

The respect enjoyed by the Hashemites has been earned. They have had a generally deserved reputation for tolerance and coexistence with other faiths and other branches of Islam. Many Iraqis look back on the era of Hashemite rule from the 1920s to the 1950s as a golden age. And during the period of over 1,000 years when the Hashemites ruled the Hejaz, wherein the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina are located, they dealt tolerantly with all Muslims during the Haj, or annual pilgrimage. Disagreements and tension under Hashemite rule have never come close either to the bloody conflicts of many centuries’ duration in Europe between Catholics and Protestants or to the massacres and hatred perpetrated by the Wahhabis and their allies in the House of Saud.

Recently in a brilliant essay in the New Republic, Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen has pointed out that tolerance and “the exercise of public reason” have given democracy solid roots in many of the world’s non-European cultures, and that balloting must be accompanied by such local traditions in order for democracy and the rule of law to take root. The legitimacy and continuity which the Hashemites represent for large numbers of people in the Middle East, and the tolerance of “public reason” with which they have been associated, could provide a useful underpinning for the growth of democracy in Iraq.

Historically, rulers in the Middle East have held office for life and have nominated their successors, ordinarily from within the reigning family. This ensured legitimacy, stability and continuity, and usually though not invariably took the form of monarchy. In the modern era succession by violence has sadly become more prevalent. It would be reasonable to use the traditional Middle Eastern concepts of legitimacy and succession and to build on the wide and historic appreciation for the rule of law and of limited government to help bring about a transition to democracy. The identification of legitimacy with the Western practice of balloting has now occurred in many cultures around the world, but it may well occur sooner in Iraq if it is developed at least initially as an expanding aspect of an already legitimate constitutional order.

Some contend that a process that gave the U.N. a central role would somehow confer legitimacy. We are at a loss to understand this argument. Nearly 40% of the U.N. members’ governments do not practice succession by election. In the Middle East only Israel and Turkey do so. Why waste time with U.N. member governments, many of them nondemocratic, working out their differences–and some indeed fundamentally oppose democracy in Iraq–when the key parties who need to do that are the Iraqis? Besides, real legitimacy ultimately will come about when Iraq has a government that “deriv[es] its just power from the consent of the governed.” During a transition in which Iraq is moving toward democracy, a government that is operating under its existing constitution, with a monarch as called for in that document, is at least as legitimate as the governments of U.N. members that are not democracies at all.

Much would hinge on the willingness of the king to work closely and cooperatively with Amb. Bremer and to appoint a responsible and able prime minister. The king should be a Hashemite prince with political experience and no political obligations or commitments. In view of the nation’s Shiite majority, the prime minister should be a modern Shiite with a record of opposition to tyranny and oppression. Such leaders would be well-suited to begin the process that would in time lead to genuinely free and fair elections, sound amendments to the 1925 Iraqi Constitution, and the election of a truly representative governing body. We would also strongly suggest that the choices of king and prime minister be made on the basis of character, ability and political experience–not on the basis of bias, self-interest, grudges or rivalries held or felt by some in the region and indeed by some in the U.S. government.

Mr. Lewis is a professor emeritus at Princeton and the author, most recently, of “The Crisis of Islam” (Modern Library, 2003). Mr. Woolsey is a former director of the CIA.

“The Distinguished One Who is Sent to Earth to Rule is Shah Mardan”-Qutb ul-Ghawth Mawlana Shaykh Nazim Adil al-Haqqani -Laylatu-l Bara’at – June 24th, 2013

image

The following are excerpts from the final ‘Laylatu-l Bara’at’ sermon by Sultan ul-Awliya al-Sayyid al-Sharif Mawlana Shaykh Muhammad Nazim Adil Al-Haqqani An-Naqshbandi (qadasAllahu sirrahul ‘aziz), 24th June, 2013, Lefke, Cyprus

Who is Man?

Bismillahi r-Rahmani r-Rahim. Let us start O Shah Mardan. Your yaran are your admirers. May our day be mubarak. May our Night of Bara’at be mubarak. May our Lord accept us for His servanthood. O Yaran Shah Mardan – Allah Allah- those who keep the way of Allah’s Lion. Keep the lion’s way and you will be a Sultan. Don’t keep the way of donkeys, you will be a donkey. Hayfa, shame on those people who cannot present their service to their Lord Who made them Sultans. Hayfa, shame on them. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. Your yaran are your admirers. Your knowledge is abundant, your ‘hilm’(mild-manner) is abundant. You are the representative of the one who is dressed with Sultanate from the Heavens.

Allahu Akbar, Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar wa Lillahi l-Hamd. Allahumma inni dhaifun wa qawwi dha’fi fi ridak. O our Lord, we are weak servants. There is no power in us. However Allah Almighty made Man, Sultan on earth. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. Go ahead and speak, explain for us who is Man. Who is Man? This is a sohbat from Shah Mardan to us, which teaches what our path, our destination should be; what things we should do. Shah Mardan is a Sultan. Where is his knowledge from? His knowledge is from the knowledge of Rabbu l-Izzat’s Beloved Habib (sallAllahu alaihi wa sallam), it is a drop from the ocean of his knowledge. O Allah! Bayyid wujuhana Ya Rabbana. (Whiten our faces with light). Let us pray.

This last night, the 15th of Sha’ban al-Mu’azzam, it was Laylatu-l Bara’at, wasn’t it? May He(SubhanaHu wa Ta’ala) dress on us the fadhilah (virtues), the barakah (blessings), the honour, the rif’at (dignity), the majesty, the uns (familiarity), the power of this Laylatu-l Bara’at. Be a man so that you can be dressed! They don’t bring a man who sweeps the streets and make him sit on the throne of the Sultan. How can that be? A person who collects trash? The Children of Adam – the mumtaz (distinguished) one who is sent to earth to rule is Shah Mardan. He is the lion who is appointed to declare the honour of the children of Adam on earth. They are sent from Heavens to earth. He is appointed to discipline them, to teach them adab.

Know that a Person is With Whom He Loves

O yaran Shah Mardan- the yaran, lovers of Shah Mardan; Al-mar’u ma’a man ahab. The person is with whom he loves. Know that a person is with whom he loves. Love, so that you can be loved. If you don’t love, people won’t love you either. You should love, you should know how to love. Who has forgotten to love someone, who doesn’t know how to love is not Man. A person who knows how to love is crowned. Allah Allah! Madad Ya Sahiba z-Zaman, Madad Ya Sahibul-Dawran, Madad Ya Shah Mardan.

Your Almighty Lord Created You for His Service

Allah Almighty Who is al-Khaliq (The Creator) created you for service. People should pay attention to this. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. Listen, listen to what comes from Shah Mardan. Last night was the 15th day of Sha’ban al-Mu’azzam. It is a mu’azzam (great) month, and it is a mu’azzam night. Last night was the night when a Nur and surur (joy) which is impossible to describe descends from the Heavens and is dressed on the Children of Adam. Say “Allahu Akbar, Allahu Akbar, Allahu Akbar” and don’t fear. Don’t scream, don’t scream and go out in the streets. Go ahead O Shah Mardan, may you describe us. Your listeners, your yaran, who love you, are all listening. How should you be? What should you be living for? How did you come into existence? For what do you exist? Is there anyone who asks this? Is there anyone who asks “For what reason are we in this dunya?”. There is no one who asks because there is no one who recites the Bismillah. Say Bismillahi r-Rahmani r-Rahim and such doors open for you. But what they teach (in schools) is – there are lions in Africa, there are tigers in India. There is shaytan in China. There is a foolish one in Russia. And for the others, each one has a mentality and a quality.

But the quality which is really asked from man is, your Almighty Lord created you for service. He(SubhanaHu wa Ta’ala) is the Sultan of Sultans and He (swt) invited you to His service. Invitation meaning, Accept My service. Don’t say “May I be a Bey, may I be a Pasha, may I be a King”. What are you on this earth? Why do you exist on this earth? You should know this. He (swt) did not create you to be a Bey, to be a Pasha, to be an emperor in dunya, but created you for service, the Khaliqu-l Yazdan. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. He says, our Lord Who created us and sent us down from Heavens to earth created us for service. But you serve donkeys! It has no value! Can a person who serves the Sultan be the same as who serves donkeys? You are attracted to the dirty dunya. You say “I want the dirty dunya”. You say “I am a servant to dirty dunya”. What can you gain from it?

Don’t sleep! Open your eyes. Here, this night is Laylatu-l Bara’at. Laylatu-l Bara’at. O Yaran Shah Mardan. O Shah Mardan, inform us. Tell us what a night this night is. Tell us about the power of Laylatu-l Bara’at. Allahu Dhu l-Jalal informed our Prophet (sallAllahu alaihi wa sallam) of its power and majesty and he (sas) informed Shah Mardan. Go ahead Shah Mardan, describe for us how the service of Allah should be. You open your door and run to your business. You open your door and run to your farm. You open your door and run to your office. What is this? What a burden is this you have, that you run outside as soon as you open your eyes, even before washing your face. You say “I am going to work”. What is your work? “I have a grocery shop”, or “I am a green grocer”, or “I am a worker in the government office” or “I am the government”. Where is the dhawk (pleasure), the shawk (enthusiasm) in this? There is nothing.

Do you say Bismillahi r-Rahmani r-Rahim when you open your door? Do you say the Name of Who created you? Know this O man, know your honour. Know your honour. What will they do with you if you don’t know? If man doesn’t know about his honour – before there were water-wheel donkeys for the wells. Do you know of them? The water-wheel donkeys. At that time there were no pumps, motors like now. They would dig a well and pull up the water from it. It keeps turning and turning around, to pull up the water. They cover the eyes of that animal also and say “let it turn around”. It keeps going around. Then? Then water comes up. O man, are you a water-wheel donkey? Did Allahu Dhu l-Jalal, Who is the Sahibu-l Mutlaq (Absolute Owner) create you as a water-wheel donkey? O shameless ones! For this they are beaten with whips, with sticks more and more.

O Man! What all the 124 000 Prophets said, “Your Lord created you for His service”. He (SubhanaHu wa Ta’ala) created you for His service, not to be water-wheel donkeys. So now the people of this time, the little men, the animals in the shape of men, don’t understand that our honour and service is in service to the Creator. Our Lord did not make us water-wheel donkeys – The animals whose eyes are covered and turn the wheel around from morning till evening, to pull up a handful of water. Why do you degrade yourself to this level? O people! O Turk, O Kurd, O Alawi, O Shi’a, O Russian, O British, O American-all are like this.

A Mu’azzam (Great) Night

Last night was a mu’azzam (great) night. The bandits’ names were revealed in Heavens as well as the names of who are saeed (happy) and clean. There is a page on which their names are written with happiness and it appeared on the Preserved Tablet. And there is another group whose actions belong to hellfire. Their names also came out as bandits. Shame on those nations that couldn’t have their names written in the book of Saeeds (happy ones), they didn’t do the service Allah likes. Go ahead O Shah Mardan! O Yaran Shah Mardan. Listen! Understand! “‘Anna l- Quwata Lillahi Jami`aan” (2:165) Whole power, absolute sultanate belongs to our Lord. If He (SubhanaHu wa Ta’ala) judges you, there is no one who can save you because you didn’t accept your Lord, you refused His service. You slaughtered each other to rule the dirty dunya. Shame on you! O Bashar, what were you going to bring to the people of Syria? Here is the fire you brought, here are the weapons you brought. Shame on you and your humanity. But “Fa yantaqimu Llahu Minhu” (5:95). I will take revenge on them, says Allah Almighty.

O our Lord! For the honour of this holy night, for the honour of Your Habib (sallAllahu alaihi wa sallam), send us a Sultan who will raise Your flags and defeat these ones. O our Lord, Ya Rabbi. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. May our lives be sacrificed for you, on your way, O beautiful Shah Mardan. Shah Mardan tells you to keep his way so that you may be accepted. Don’t puff up like a turkey. Don’t be proud with your weapons. Above you there are the armies of Angels who will crush and sweep you. A thousand angels descended and made the mushrik armies all scattered. If they didn’t scatter, another 3000, 5000, 7000 angels were standing waiting for the order. And all of them have taswim (marks) like this. It says “Al-Mala’ikati Musawwimina” (3:125). Where are you, O Muslims! You wear the unbelievers’ hats. Why don’t you wear this on your head so that you become majestic, so that angels descend for you.

O our Lord, may You forgive us. With the tajalli (manifestation) of last night, we hope that starting from today there will come the servants who will display the sign of Islam. They will sweep away the ones who don’t wear this sign. It says “Musawwimin”. O Lord, forgive us. O Shah Mardan. O Shah Mardan. You said it beautifully. Your yaran admire you. May these knowledges reach to our hearts. May our bodies enter the path you are speaking of. Our Lord is SubhanaHu wa Ta’ala. May we enter His path and gain majesty. No one may rebel, saying “I have weapons, cannons, planes”. All of their heads will fall off. He will not leave any Iranian, Turk or Alawi. When they raise their heads (rebel), he will crush their heads. There are some coiled snakes. May Allah keep us away from such snakes. That animal lies quietly. If you disturb it, it raises its head and attacks. Once it attacks, you can’t stop it anymore. Yes! There are snakes and there are dragons also. Dragons swallow all of the snakes and say “Is there more?”

Go ahead O Shah Mardan. There is a nation, there are soldiers among the soldiers Allah sent, who will swallow all the power of the unbelievers. Listen and fear. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. May our health be in afiyah (wellness). May we love and be loved. This should be our aim. We don’t love, neither are we loved. Shame on all the people, and on their claim of humanity. Who doesn’t love is not loved and who is not loved doesn’t love. O Ghani Sultan. Here is your yaran, O Shah Mardan. O yaran Shah Mardan. He is coming. He doesn’t fear any weapons. He can turn whole world upside down with one Takbir. Hide from it, beware of it. Don’t have a desire for the unbelievers- don’t say “I wish they were from us”. The powers that descended from Heavens for Muslims were not granted to the unbelievers. He can destroy them all with one breath. There is such a power. There are 7000 Angels ready in Heavens, to support Islam.

Come to your senses O Turk, O Kurd! Don’t say “I want this, I want that”. Seek the servanthood of Allah and everything comes to you, is given to you. If you don’t seek His servanthood what will happen to you is what will happen to the snake. Tawba Ya Rabbi, tawba Astaghfirullah. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. Your yaran admire you. May we also be under your wing of power and protected by you. May he protect us, protect us O Shah Mardan. Protect us O Shah Mardan. Appear O Shah Mardan! O Allah! O Allah! O Allah! With the manifestation of last night may a power open for the nations of the Habib (sallAllahu alaihi wa sallam), Ya Rabbi. May the unbelievers all die, disappear and eat each other. Don’t fight. “Wa kunu mina s-salihin”. “Be from the good ones” says Allah. If not, you are trash. Go ahead O Shah Mardan. Masha Allah la quwwata illa biLlah.

Yes, it will definitely come. Starting from today, definitely a power will appear. It is the promise of Rabbu-l Izzat. O our Lord, for the honour of Your beloved Habib (sallAllahu alaihi wa sallam) may You reveal the power of Shah Mardan. May You reveal it. May the majesty of Islam appear Ya Rabb. For the honour of Your Habib (sallAllahu alaihi wa sallam), and for the honour of Shah Mardan, Fatiha.

This sohbat is strong. Pay attention. More will come after the news of last night. Pay attention, it will sweep. Who claim to be God… Leave aside the claims of being God, a tornado is coming that will sweep all who claim to be shaytan. There are small tornadoes coming now here and there, spinning. Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar. There is also another kind of tornado in Heaven. It sweeps everything when it descends.
Aman Ya Rabbi, Tawba Ya Rabbi. Tawba.

http://sufiqalam.wordpress.com/

“I want the hearts of Muslims to be inflamed with love for Shah-e Mardan…”-Qutb ul-Ghawth Mawlana Sultan ul-Awliya Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani

image

“O lovers of Shah-e Mardan! InshAllah I will fill the whole world with the love of Shah-e Mardan. With his love I want to conquer their hearts. I am nothing. But I want the hearts of Muslims to be inflamed with love for Shah-e Mardan…” Shaykh ul-Akbar, Sultan ul-Awliya al-Sayyid al-Sharif Mawlana Shaykh Muhammad Nazim Adil an-Naqshbandi al-Haqqani qadas Allahu sirrahul ‘aziz