Shaykh al-Akbar Muhiuddin Ibn Arabi and Mawlana Shaykh Nazim: “There is more than one Adam”

image

“‘…I said: “Once in a visionary experience   (waqi’a) I had, I saw an individual circumambulating [the Ka’ba], who told me that he was among my ancestors and gave me his name [124].  Then I asked him about the time of his death, and he told me it was 40,000 years [earlier].  So I proceeded to ask him about Adam, because of what has been established in our chronology concerning his period [i.e., that it was much more recent]. Then he said to me: “Which Adam are you asking about? About the most recent Adam?'””

124. This encounter is described in greater detail in chapter 390 of the Futuhat (devoted to the inner meaning of “time”, al-zaman), in a passage (III 459.8-14) which clearly brings out the…character of this particular experience. “Now God caused me to see…while I was going around the Ka’ba…” There this mysterious “ancestor” also reminds Ibn Arabi of the hadith of the Prophet stating that, “God created 100,000 Adams.”  [Al-Futuhat Al Makkiya: The Meccan Revelations. Ibn Al ‘Arabi. Volume 1. P. 222. Translated by William C. Chittick & James W. Morris. Pir Press. New York. ISBN 1-879708-16-7]

“Our GrandShaykh says, ‘Knowledge is an endless ocean…Saints know about from before the time of Adam (peace be upon him)….Our GrandShaykh said that this is the period of our father Adam (peace be upon him) and his sons. We are living in it now. But before our father’s period, so many Adams have been created-no one knows their (exact)number!…Each Adam, and his sons were generally like us, in that they may be recognized as sons of Adam. All are servants of our Lord. Also, He Almighty, alone, knows how many Adams will come after us, how many periods there will be….Our GrandShaykh says, ‘Allah Almighty was addressing those Adams that were created before our father, Adam (peace be upon him) with the secrets of the Holy Quran. Quran, the Holy book, contains endless secret knowledge. Its secrets are such that you can find, included in it, all news from before and after us.” (Mercy Oceans: The Teachings of Maulana Abdullah al-Faizi ad-Daghestani, on p. 104-105)

Political Zionism Another Form of Ideological Fundamentalism? Globalresearch.ca

image

His Majesty King Abdullah I, King of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (1946–51)

The Political Zionist doctrine of the Netanyahu government that claims the whole of former Palestine as being a ‘gift from God’ is essentially ideological fundamentalism i.e. a ritualistic reading of scripture and a reliance upon dogma – a position also known as ‘extremism’.

It is this fundamentalist ideology that gives the state of Israel its sole claim to the West Bank and East Jerusalem – which position it relies upon exclusively in its assertion that its policy that has persuaded half a million of its citizens to settle on Palestinian land is legitimate when the entire international community has branded it a violation of international law.

The paradox in the status quo established by the Likud government to back-up its claim to the occupied Palestinian Territories, is that Israel actually claims to be a secular state. This means that its claim to the West Bank and East Jerusalem is merely a fabricated position used to justify that which is unjustifiable.

Political or religious extremism is unacceptable to the democratic nations of the world in the 21st century, and the UN Security Council should pass a resolution to that effect. In the event that any UNSC member would use its veto against such a resolution then it will be clear to all as to where the illegality lies; who supports and fuels the conflict and who it is that ensures the continuity of the illegal settlements and the dispossession of the oldest continuous indigenous people of the region, the Palestinian Arabs who have farmed and lived on the land for over a thousand years.

Fundamentalism either in Paris, London, Jerusalem or Hebron needs to be dealt with in an appropriate manner by democratic governments. We have all seen the damaging violence that such extremist beliefs can bring to the community of free nations.

Action is needed now to root-out fundamentalism wherever it rears its head – regardless of the attitude of any state or party that overtly, or covertly, supports such violence.

From: http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-political-zionism-another-form-of-ideological-fundamentalism/5424400

Re: Koran should be read at Prince Charles’ coronation: An Open Letter to Rt Rev. the Lord Harries of Pentegarth DD by Sayyid Amiruddin

BismillahArabicThe Rt Rev. the Lord Harries of Pentregarth DD
House of Lords, London, England,
United Kingdom SW1A 0PW
Re: Koran should be read at Prince Charles’ coronation

February 3rd, 2015

In The Name of God, All Compassionate and All Merciful

Dear Lord Harries,

I pray this finds you in the best of health, by the grace of God I am also fine.  I wanted to congratulate you for taking a brave stance in suggesting that verses of the Holy Quran also be read at the coronation of His Royal Highness Prince Charles.

I would like to start with a brief introduction of myself. I am a born and raised Canadian Muslim of the Naqshbandi Sufi Order, authorized by the late Grand Shaykh Nazim Adil al-Haqqani (d.2014), who was regarded as the world’s leading recognized authority on Sufism this century. I am a published author and have lectured at several Canadian universities. I have advised Canadian officials on policy related matters since 2005.  I was personally called upon by the Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, have spoke at conferences alongside the US Vice President Al Gore, some of Canada’s leading intellectuals and was called to testify before the Senate of Canada.  I have made over one hundred and ten national media appearances, am mentioned by name in the WikiLeaks Cables, and am cited as an ‘inspirational leader’  in the “Laurier M.A. Journal on Religion And Culture”.

I advocate, faith based radicalization – the catalyst of which is a misinterpretation of faith, is in fact nothing more than a political fallacy and as such, a political alternative must also be offered to at risk groups in addition a faith-based counter-narrative. I hold the political alternative to be monarchy and monarchism, and believe, in the context of Islamist terrorism and radicalization, closer cultural ties between the United Kingdom’s Muslims and the monarchy is key.

Let us not forget the Children of Abraham include both the Children of Israel, and the Children of Ishmael. The Holy Bible and the Holy Quran are the holy books of the Israelites and Ishmaelites. Every citizen of the United Kingdom, and Canada for that matter, has sworn an oath of allegiance and loyalty to Her Majesty the Queen at the time of obtaining their citizenship.

At the roots of our monarchy is the inextricable relation between the monarch and the Church. Keeping in mind the Preface to the 39 Articles of the Church of England which describe the monarch as ‘being by God’s Ordinance, according to Our just Title, Defender of the Faith and … Supreme Governor of the Church of England’  and that our future king, the Prince of Wales, has commented thoughtfully that as monarch he would like to make the role of the Crown in defending that freedom more explicit, and so be called ‘Defender of Faith’, I have compiled as a follow up to your statement in the press twelve relevant translated verses from the Holy Quran which I propose be considered to be read at the coronation followed by prayers from the Holy Quran also to be read aloud for the king.

Additionally, given that there are non-Christian, Muslim subjects of the monarchy who are loyal and have sworn allegiance to the monarch by virtue of citizenship, but cannot relate to the Christian faith, I propose the following measures be taken with cooperation of the Church of England:

  1. Develop a non-Christian yet Abrahamic faith friendly version of the relevant main Articles of the 39 Articles of the Church of England which could connect willing subjects through a subsidiary non-Christian organization to the spiritual office of our royal family.
  2. Develop an office under a subsidiary organization for a “Naqeeb al-Ashraaf” and a “Shaykh al-Islam” for British Muslims in recognition of their sworn oath of allegiance to the monarch and loyalty to the royal family.
  3. The creation of offices of nobility for qualifying Muslim subjects.  Arabs and Muslim societies have had monarchies for nearly 1400 years, many of whom had ties to our royal family.  An example would be the Asif Jahi dynasty of the former Princely Nizam State of Hyderabad. There are descendants of these dynasties now living in the United Kingdom, who have also sworn allegiance to Her Majesty the Queen and acquired citizenship.
  4. Calling upon Muslim subjects in the United Kingdom to institutionalize prayers for the well being of the monarch and the royal family after every Friday prayer.

A peaceful co-existence of the Children of Abraham is possible in the West starting with countries under our monarchy.  The need to bridge the gap between non-Christian followers of the Abrahamic faiths and our monarchy is not limited to the Arab and Muslim immigrant community.  In fact, monarchism must be encouraged and proliferated in the Jewish community in the United Kingdom as well, the vast majority of whom, in my experience, are more loyal to the Jewish State of Israel in the Middle East than they are to both the United Kingdom and our monarchy.

There is room for political re-illumination in both communities and I am told the time is now.

With kind regards.

Yours Sincerely,

Sayyid Amiruddin
Chairman, Alsunnahfoundation.org

Proposed Recitation Verses from the Koran for His Royal Highness Prince Charles’ Coronation
Compiled by Sayyid Amiruddin

1:01:01 In The Name of God, All Compassionate, All Merciful

2:30 And [mention], when your Lord said to the Angels: “Indeed, I will make upon the earth a viceroy” they said: Wilt Thou place therein one who will do harm therein and will shed blood, while we, we hymn Thy praise and sanctify Thee? He said: Surely I know that which ye know not

7:11 And We created Adam, then fashioned him, then We told the Angels: Fall ye prostrate before Adam! And they fell prostrate, except for Satan. He was not of those who prostrated

3:33 Verily God did elevate Adam and Noah, the Family of Abraham, and the Family of ‘Imran over the worlds, Offspring, one of the other: And God heareth and knoweth all things

5:12 God made a Covenant of old with the Children of Israel and We raised among them Twelve Chieftains, and God said: Lo! I am with you. If ye establish worship and pay the poor-due, and believe in My Messengers and support them, and lend unto God a kindly loan, surely I shall remit your sins, and surely I shall bring you into Gardens underneath which rivers flow. Whoso among you disbelieveth after this will go astray from a plain road  

19:54 Those were some of the Prophets on whom God did bestow His Grace,- of the descendents of Adam, and of those who We carried (in the Ark) with Noah, and of the descendents of Abraham and (also) Israel of those whom We guided and chose. Whenever the Signs of (God) Most Gracious were rehearsed to them, they would fall down in prostrate adoration and in tears

2:248 And their Prophet said to them, “Surely the sign of his kingship is that the Ark, will come up to you; in it (are) a Covenant from your Lord, and a remnant of what the House of Moses, and the House of Aaron left (behind), the Angels carrying it. Surely in that is indeed a sign for you, in case you are believers

2:251 So they routed them by God’s leave and David slew Goliath; and God gave him the kingdom and wisdom, and taught him of that which He willeth. And if God had not repelled some men by others the earth would have been corrupted. But God is a Lord of Kindness to (His) creatures

34:013 Give thanks, O House of David! Few of My bondmen are thankful

38:26 (And it was said unto him): O David! Lo! We have set thee as a viceroy in the earth; therefore judge aright between mankind, and follow not desire that it beguile thee from the way of God. Lo! those who wander from the way of God have an awful doom, for as much as they forgot the Day of Reckoning

27:15 And We verily gave knowledge unto David and Solomon, and they said: Praise be to God, Who hath preferred us above many of His believing slaves!

4:54 But We had already given the Family of Abraham the Book and Wisdom, and conferred upon them a Mighty Kingdom

Prayer for the King

3:26 Say: “O God! The All Possessor of the kingdom, Thou givest the kingdom to whomsoever Thou pleasest and takest away the kingdom from whomsoever Thou pleasest, and Thou exaltest whom Thou pleasest and abasest whom Thou pleasest in Thine hand is the good; surely, Thou hast power over all things

1:01:01-07 In The Name of God, the All Compassionate and All Merciful. All Praise be to God, Lord of all the worlds. The Compassionate, the Merciful. Sovereign of the Day of Recompense. You alone do we worship, and You alone do we ask for help. Guide us on the straight path, the path of those who have received your grace; not the path of those who have brought down wrath, nor of those who wander astray. Amen.

Full Democracy AND “Islamicism”, Terrorism, and Jihadism Are Political Fallacies for Canada by Sayyid Amiruddin

image

“Saudi intelligence chief Prince Bandar flew a leading member of the Houthi delegation via London for a meeting. Incredible as it seemed, the Saudis were re-opening contact with an Iranian-backed Zaydi or Shia sect with whom they had once fought bitter wars. The Saudi/Emirati plan was to use the Houthis to engage and destroy their real target which was Islah, the Islamist party and chief representative of the Sunni tribes in Yemen. As elsewhere in the Arab world, the entire focus of (King) Abdullah’s foreign policy after 2011 was to stop the Arab Spring in its tracks in Tunisia and Egypt and crush all forces capable of mounting an effective opposition in the Gulf States. Everything else, including the rise of Saudi’s foremost regional rival Iran, became subservient to that paramount aim to crush democratic political Islam.” – David Hearst, The Huffington Post, January 23rd, 2015 

“…today’s radicalization prevention and deradicalization strategies in the region which is most threatened by it, demand a political alternative, or counter narrative to the terrorist definition of the political caliphate. The Sauds and others have rightfully identified monarchism as that exact alternative. While the Americans refused to proliferate monarchism, even after Bernard Lewis and former CIA director Woolsey recommended it back in 2003, His Majesty King Abdullah ibn Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia has….As such, they initiated refroms, shook hands with the Hashemites, and Moroccans, and began funding the good guys, in the Arab world and in places like Somalia now, and have declared war on ISIS. The Saudi Arabian reforms, Libya, and Egypt for example, demostrate according to the Arab leaders, democracy can actually stay in the West where it belongs.”-Sayyid Amiruddin, November 23rd, 2014

It is generally agreed that terrorism is a political fallacy and not confined to Islam the faith, or any faith for that matter. The question is then to get right the political alternative to Islamist terrorism or jihadism.  It is monarchism. Canada is a constitutional monarchy.  We are not a full democracy like America or its own little racist “Vatican”; the Jewish State of Israel, also a democracy which rejects monarchism.  The key to deradicalization programs and preventing radicalism in countries of the commonwealth is connecting with our monarchy and acceptance of our political system which maintains a status for monarchy as a superior one to others, namely jihadism, terrorism and democracy. One cannot be a Canadian without allegiance to our monarchy.  There are twelve monarchs even today in Europe.  This is the key point which solves the debate of jihadism and shuts the mouths of those who hate Islam as well.  You will find both terrorists and those who insult Islam have no desire to openly advocate monarchism, and our monarchy, even if they are elected officials or the PM for that matter of a constitutional monarchy! They have or are working for another agenda. There is a crystal clear conflict of national interest and they are not loyal to the central idea, monarchism, which defines us as who we are as Canadians or members of the commonwealth.  See for yourself!

Praise of the late Khadim ul-Haramayn Sharifayn King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz of the House of Saud by GrandShaykh Mehmet Effendi Jan 26th, 2015

image

“…He will not be remembered as an oppressor, or someone who caused troubles, or someone who led people to the wrong path. This person spread his hands before our Prophet’s holy grave and made dua…Even in Saudi Arabia there aren’t as many extreme Wahabis or Salafis as there are in those countries. This is an important lesson. This man did a great service. This is big proof against those people who don’t respect or honour our Prophet. The scholars there could have stood up and said that this is wrong. But they didn’t. That means it’s not wrong, not shameful, not against Islam. It is something in Islam. If it wasn’t right, then all the Wahabi scholars there would stand up and say the king did wrong. Since they didn’t, it means the way of Ahli Sunnah Wal Jama’a is correct. The others, who don’t glorify our Prophet, are on the wrong way. May Allah give them correct thinking to come to the right way and do service for their people, for their country. There is a need for this. To help all Muslims to come to the right way will be a big grant for them…We are saying this for occasion of King Abdullah, rahmatullah alayhi, the King of Saudi Arabia. He was very good man, very good king and Allah making him to pass away Friday night. Friday night, it is a very holy night. Who pass away in this night, on this day, be very easy for him to be in grave. Allah, the generosity of Allah, it will be on him. Alhamdulillah, he is coming from the dynasty of Saudi. This dynasty, they were making, of course, not good things because they are taking all the Shareef and killing, and taking from Hijaz, from Hashemi, they throw them out. But Allah, He is able to do everything. Allah make this man to make very good things for Islam also, because he was loving Prophet (sws), respecting Prophet (sws). In his time, it was very smooth, very gentle for Hajjis, for visitors of Prophet (sws). It was not like before. Before they were pushing people, “don’t make this, this is shirk, this is not good, this is haram”. But alhamdulillah, he was coming and standing in front of Prophet (sws) and making dua facing Prophet (sws). And nobody, after this could say anything to the Hajjis. So even this one, it is enough for him. But he make many things also for love of Prophet (sws). And he was happy with end of his life. ” (GrandShaykh Mehmet Effendi, Saltanat.org)

image

His Majesty King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud with Sayyid Muhammad ibn Alawi al-Maliki

Power. Morning Sohbet by Sayyid Amiruddin December 30th, 2014

image

As salamu alaikum! Eh Yaran i-Mardan. Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem. 

Ahl al-Sunnah is not an idea. Because true Ahl al-Sunnah are royalists, are monarchists, they accept and have connection to the Thaqlayn; the Quran and the Prophetic House.  Know, today, when we refer to Ahl al-Sunnah, it is no longer a political slogan. Traditional Islam is not a political slogan. It is not simply an idea, a counter-narrative. No, it is a power which smashes Bid’ah. It expels darkness from homes. It illuminates the city. It eats away the foundations of falsehood and collapses it.  “Wa qul jaa al-Haqq wa zahaqal Batil, innal Batila kana zahuqaa.  Wa nu nazzilu minal Qurani ma huwa shifaa un wa rahmatal lil mominina wa la yazidud dhalimina illa khasaraa.” (17:81-82 And say: Truth hath come and falsehood hath vanished away. Lo! falsehood is ever bound to vanish. And We send down, of the Quran, that which is a healing and a mercy to the believers; and the tyrants it increases not, except in loss.)  You must also be aware, Awliya are not people who only dress like holy people.  Wiliyat is a power, it means authority.  It is supported by Karamat.  The greater the granted Wiliyat, the greater the support from above, Madad, to demonstrate its validity, and legitimacy.  It is a power which cannot be stopped.  Abraham and Moses single handedly defeated without weapons Nimrod and Pharaoh. It is a Power. Sometimes it is found among those who are hidden, not identifiable, but in plain sight, like the cobbler who prevented Emperor Aurangzeb from winning at Golconda.  Find those people.  Make them your advisors as did kings before you. Islam is a power.  It is directly connected to the Heavens, to the heart of the Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wa aalihi wa salllam). Nothing can stand with authority above it. Real Islam is with real authority. Real authority is backed with Madad. Madad comes to the Awliya from the Twelve Imams, who receive it from the Prophet Muhammad through his beloved heir, his holy daughter Sayyida Fatima al-Zahra salutations be upon her. (3:120-26 Remember that morning Thou didst leave Thy household (early) to post the faithful at their stations for battle: And Allah heareth and knoweth all things: When two parties of you almost fell away, and Allah was their Protecting Friend. In Allah let believers put their trust. And already had Allah given you victory at [the battle of] Badr while you were few in number. Then fear Allah ; perhaps you will be grateful. Remember thou saidst to the Faithful: “Is it not enough for you that Allah should help you with three thousand angels (Specially) sent down? Yea, – if ye remain firm, and act aright, even if the enemy should rush here on you in hot haste, your Lord would help you with five thousand angels Making a terrific onslaught.  Allah ordained this only as a message of good cheer for you, and that thereby your hearts might be at rest – Victory cometh only from Allah, the Mighty, the Wise). Mahdi ‘alayhi salam is a Fatimid in its truest, not claimed, sense.  He comes with an indisputable inherited power. The Ark of the Covenant is a power. Christians, since the first Crusade, and todays Zionists are seeking it.  They believe it is under Al Aqsa so they are digging tunnels and want to collapse it.  So do Muslims. As soon as they find it, they want to kill all opposition and demolish Al Aqsa Mosque and build a new temple.  Muslims have neglected Al Aqsa, so they, like Al Aqsa are too surrounded by their enemies who wish to demolish them and their countries. It is the core issue.  Al Aqsa is under His Majesty King Abdullah II Ibn Al Hussein of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.  His authority as the legal Custodian of Al Aqsa is recognized internationally and is not only limited to what people assume is a mystical statement.  Recognition of the Custodian of Al Aqsa is mandatory for all Muslims as is recognition for the Custodian of the Grand Mosques, Haramayn Sharifayn. Whether you accept it or not, whoever sits in the office of Custodianship of the Haramayn Sharifayn, the three Grand Mosques, Makkah, Madinatul Munawwara, and Masjid Al Aqsa, controls, yeilds true power.  Approach them and counsel them, win them to your view, and watch overnight how the dynamics of todays world change and watch the punishment suddenly stop.  Sultan ul-Awliya Mawlana Shaykh Nazim al-Haqqani opened these words since yesterday in Shah Mardan’s morning assembly.  It is new opportunity for you. Stop.

Re: Who was the Mujaddid of last century, Ahmed Rida Khan or Mehr Ali Shah Dec 10th, 2014- By Sayyid Amiruddin

Name of Muhammad al-Mahdi at Masjid an-Nabawi

Name of Muhammad al-Mahdi at Masjid an-Nabawi

There is a debate among Muslims of the Sub continent regarding who the Mujaddid of last century was. While it is a good thing to try to identify the Mujaddid in order to seek out the main points of renovation in their teachings, it would also be just as important to seek a noble leader for this era as well. The following is my reply to the debate on the identification of the Mujaddid of last century between Muslims who follow the renowned Qutb Pir Mehr Ali Shah (b.1859) and the Hanafi jurist Ahmed Rida Khan Berelvi (b.1856). My opinion is the work of the Mujaddid must itself be of direct political consequences or that the Mujaddid himself an individual bestowed with undeniable political authority.

“…That was a very significant era which brought about a lot of change. The fundamental question is what is the role of the Mujaddid? If it is to revive Islam, then what defines Islam? According to our view, rooted in the hadith of Thaqlayn, the Mujaddid is a forerunner to the reforms of the Fatimid, al-Mahdi al-Muntadhar from the House of the Holy Prophet (S), Ahl al-Bayt. In light of the ahadith, the greatest reforms or renovations in the era of the Mahdi are political based on theological reformation and renovation of the entire Muslim world. Ibn Arabi said these reforms in that era will begin with the death penalty being pronounced on 70,000 Fuqaha by the Mahdi. Also, these reforms will directly result in a change of power dynamics in the Arab and Muslim world, granting the Mahdi of the Ahl al-Bayt absolute political and theological power, Wiliyat i-Mutlaqa, and to the House of the Prophet (S). As such, when looking for or to identify a Mujaddid, search for that person who empowered or equipped that cause most. The era of Pir Mehr Ali Shah and Ahmed Rida Khan was full of various reformers at different levels in society. Some created confusion while others did not. However, it is crucial to point out, during that era, significant change did come about. For the first time in 1400 years since the era of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib and al-Hasan ibn ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, there was in that era a Caliph from the Ahl al-Bayt whose name was being read in Jumah Sermons at the Grand Mosque at Mecca, Medina, and in Jerusalem. All of these following individuals were of one era. Sharif Hussein b.1854 d.1931, Ahmed Rida Khan b.1856 d.1921, Pir Mehr Ali Shah b.1859 d.1937, Said i-Nursi b.1877 d.1960, Ilyas Kandhlavi b.1885 d.1944, Hasan al-Banna b.1906 d.1949, Abul Ala Maududi b.1903 d.1979, Jamaluddin Afghani b.1839 d.1897, Osman Ali Khan, Asaf Jah VII b.1886 d.1967, Mawlana Abdullah al-Faiz ad-Daghestani b.1891 d.1973, Sultan Abdul Hameed II b.1842 d.1918. Is Islam and renovation of it apolitical or does the Mujaddid address political renovation as well? Each individual must answer this themselves and will probably have a different answer. For me personally, I believe the Awliya directly influence the political climate of their eras. As such, the Qutb or Aqtab (plural for Qutb) of that era were definitely very powerful and able to do what was almost not possible in 1400 years, even if temporarily.”

Re: Assad and ISIL: Washington Post Dec 8th, 2014 -By Sayyid Amiruddin

image

The Arab Kingdom of Syria: Faisal I of the House of Sharif Hussein

“…Who can promise the Syrians martyrdom and entrance to the Heaven defined in the Quran, the Queen of which is Sayyida Fatima al-Zahra, and Princes of which are al-Hasan and al-Husayn? Who can promise them to drink at the Pond of Kawthar, where they will meet the Family of the Prophet, and face him regarding his dynasty, the Ahl al-Bayt? Who can promise Syrians this and such a honorable life and death if they are killed fighting for them other than he who sits upon the Throne of the illustrious Quraysh tribe; of the Hashemite clan; of the Adnani Arabs, belonging to the descendants of Nabat, of Kedar, Ishmael and Abraham, from the House, Ahl al-Bayt of the Sultan of Madina (S)? Syrians had a Hashemite Ahl al-Bayt Throne prior to the Assads, and Syria was known as the Arab Kingdom of Syria. They ought to fight jihad against ISIL and Assad for the return of the Ahl al-Bayt Arab Hashemite Throne in Syria, even if constitutional and ceremonial, or else their jihad is no different than that of ISIL, vigilantism, which is absolutely impermissible, Haram in Islam…”

image

The Royal Standard of the Arab Kingdom of Syria.

Re: Who has the right to manage Jerusalem? By Sayyid Amiruddin December 7th, 2014

image

…When Muslim kings managed Jerusalem,  Jews, Christians Muslims lived in peace.  Christians killed Muslims and Jews in the Holy Land and burned down the Aqsa Mosque during the Crusades so they were rejected by Divine Providence and are not allowed back permenantly until today, until they repent.  The Jews under the Jewish State burned it down again in the 1900’s and their policies since taking power by US support demonstrtes what they are actually only capable of putting bullets in the walls of Al Aqsa and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, gay pride parades in the heartland of Christianity,  Judaism and Islam.  They are in transgression of every rule of the Old Testament. Muslim kings on the other hand are the only ones who respected and protected all sites and sentiments throughout history.  Who brought the Jews back into Jerusalem after they were expelled the second time? Arab Muslims under the second rashidun caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab, who restored the religious sites of both communities as well as identified the Arab holy site.  Even until today, all of the sites of the Biblical Prophets and holy people of the Children of Israel like John the Baptist, Zakariah, Jonah, Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Ezekiel, Jethro, Aaron, the Pyramids of Giza, Joseph, David etc., and even the Church of the Holy Sepulchre where Jesus was born are protected and managed by Arab Muslims now and in the past by Muslim kings.  We can do it and are qualified to, and have done it for over 1400 years.  Jews and Christians cannot and could not do it because of religious issues and hate for others.  History and present day conditions in the Holy Land demonstrate this clearly. Arabs are better custodians.  History has demonstrated this.  I am making a case here for Al Abdaal.  Inshallah they will intercede.